Operating Model and Governance
Last updated on
Purpose
Section titled “Purpose”The operating model ensures Security and Compliance are embedded in all migration decisions, not handled as a final approval step.
Why shared review is mandatory
Section titled “Why shared review is mandatory”- Cross-domain impact: Identity, network, logging, and workload controls affect each other.
- Regulatory continuity: Compliance requirements must be reflected consistently across architecture and operations.
- Delivery reliability: Early review avoids late redesign and go-live delays.
Recommended governance structure
Section titled “Recommended governance structure”- Platform team: Owns shared controls and technical guardrails.
- Security team: Owns control requirements, threat scenarios, and assurance criteria.
- Compliance and risk: Owns regulatory interpretation, control mapping, and audit requirements.
- Application teams: Own workload-specific implementation and operational adherence.
Suggested checkpoints by phase
Section titled “Suggested checkpoints by phase”- Design checkpoint: Validate architecture approach, trust boundaries, and mandatory controls.
- Build checkpoint: Validate policy enforcement and baseline implementation.
- Pre-go-live checkpoint: Validate evidence completeness, exception handling, and incident readiness.
- Run checkpoint: Validate recurring control verification and reporting cadence.
Key artifacts
Section titled “Key artifacts”- RACI matrix: Decision and approval ownership across domains.
- Control ownership map: Mapping of each control to accountable owners.
- Exception workflow: Risk acceptance criteria, expiry dates, and remediation tracking.
- Review cadence: Recurring governance and control-review sessions.
Related Target Operating Model guidance
Section titled “Related Target Operating Model guidance”Target Operating Model provides the cross-domain operating model. Its Governance and Decision Making and Roles and Responsibilities pages connect control ownership to platform, workload, FinOps, and service-management responsibilities.
Anti-patterns to avoid
Section titled “Anti-patterns to avoid”- Security as ticket queue: Review is requested only at the end of implementation.
- Undefined risk ownership: Exceptions are granted without named accountability.
- No run-phase governance: Controls are approved once but not verified continuously.