Skip to content
Beta

Operating Model and Governance

Last updated on

The operating model ensures Security and Compliance are embedded in all migration decisions, not handled as a final approval step.

  • Cross-domain impact: Identity, network, logging, and workload controls affect each other.
  • Regulatory continuity: Compliance requirements must be reflected consistently across architecture and operations.
  • Delivery reliability: Early review avoids late redesign and go-live delays.
  • Platform team: Owns shared controls and technical guardrails.
  • Security team: Owns control requirements, threat scenarios, and assurance criteria.
  • Compliance and risk: Owns regulatory interpretation, control mapping, and audit requirements.
  • Application teams: Own workload-specific implementation and operational adherence.
  • Design checkpoint: Validate architecture approach, trust boundaries, and mandatory controls.
  • Build checkpoint: Validate policy enforcement and baseline implementation.
  • Pre-go-live checkpoint: Validate evidence completeness, exception handling, and incident readiness.
  • Run checkpoint: Validate recurring control verification and reporting cadence.
  • RACI matrix: Decision and approval ownership across domains.
  • Control ownership map: Mapping of each control to accountable owners.
  • Exception workflow: Risk acceptance criteria, expiry dates, and remediation tracking.
  • Review cadence: Recurring governance and control-review sessions.

Target Operating Model provides the cross-domain operating model. Its Governance and Decision Making and Roles and Responsibilities pages connect control ownership to platform, workload, FinOps, and service-management responsibilities.

  • Security as ticket queue: Review is requested only at the end of implementation.
  • Undefined risk ownership: Exceptions are granted without named accountability.
  • No run-phase governance: Controls are approved once but not verified continuously.